Simon Conway Morris a creationist? Well, yes. That’s no news.
I really wonder why Jerry Coyne seem to just discover that Simon Conway Morris is a creationist. SCM believes at a Creator of the universe, as any christian. That classifies him in the creationists’ set, by definition. Maybe we didn’t had enough information to see in [...]
Articles reli´s: «:creationism»
Simon Conway Morris’ creationism
Publié dans evolution, housekeeping blog, internets picks, religion, taggé creationism à février 16, 2009 | 4 Commentaires »
Don’t Call it “Darwinism”
Publié dans Charles Darwin, evolution, politics, religion, scienligion, taggé creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolutionary biology, intelligent design à février 9, 2009 | 11 Commentaires »
Don’t Call it “Darwinism”
Eugenie C. Scott and Glenn Branch
Evolution: Education and Outreach Volume 2, Number 1 / mars 2009 doi: 10.1007/s12052-008-0111-2
Darwin, Dover, ‘Intelligent Design’ and textbooks
Publié dans Charles Darwin, evolution, taggé creationism, history of science, intelligent design, science education à janvier 5, 2009 | Laisser un commentaire »
Darwin, Dover, ‘Intelligent Design’ and textbooks
Kevin PADIAN and Nicholas MATZKE
Biochem. J. (2009) 417 (29–42) doi:10.1042/bj20081534
Does science make belief in God obsolete?
Publié dans science & religion, scienligion, taggé creationism, John Templeton Foundation, JTF, Ken Miller, scienligion, soft creationism à avril 21, 2008 | 2 Commentaires »
There is a conversation at JTF’s website, one of those “Big Questions” that replaced the “Science & Religion” slogan : Does science make belief in God obsolete?
Well, that smells like “Science & Religion” after all, isn’t it? For the short version, click the image. For the long one, continue the reading here.
l’évolution “en classe”
Publié dans scienligion, taggé Charles Harper, classroom, creationism, evolution, jean staune, John Templeton Foundation à avril 10, 2008 | 2 Commentaires »
Hier je signalais le papier “darwinian evolution on chip“. C’est vrai que ce petit jouet pourra être un instrument éducatif pour les étudiants (peut-être un jour pour les élèves).
C’est sous cet angle que ScienceDaily le présente :
Evolution has taken another step away from being dismissed as “a theory” in the classroom, thanks to a new [...]
Denyse got it wrong
Publié dans science & religion, stupido, taggé creationism, Denyse O'Leary, intelligent design, theocracy à mars 3, 2008 | Laisser un commentaire »
Well, that’s just one more time and it’s a long time since I discussed it over a blog, as I think sincerely that it’s to late for Denyse to change her mind and think logically. So, no use, except when the matter is to show to others that she is wrong.
So THAT’S why the Council [...]
speechless
Publié dans stupido, taggé bad peer-review, creationism, intelligent design à février 10, 2008 | 2 Commentaires »
I am speechless. As anyone who knows me can attest, that very rarely happens.
I’m borrowing this line from Lars Juhl Jensen, to describe my current status in front of that bullshit:
We realize so far that mitochondria could be the link between the body and this preserved wisdom of the soul devoted to guaranteeing life.
Now, let’s [...]
Creationism to be banished from schools
Publié dans science & religion, taggé , creationism à octobre 17, 2007 | Laisser un commentaire »
After the recent resolution of the European Counsil, a first step is done “Creationism to be banished from Swedish schools“
A second step must be done as soon as possible “Creationism banned from European schools”
To Dembski’s question, “How far is the U.S. from following Sweden’s lead?” the answer is obvious : It’s already done Billy-boy. Obviously, [...]
