Ancient Tablet Ignites Debate on Messiah and Resurrection
Le New York Times a un article au sujet d’une ancienne tablette qui raconterait une histoire comparable à celle de Jesus; avant Jesus. Les évangiles seraient-ils la re-édition d’une histoire copiée ?
Et quid des droits d’auteur ?
Ca serait marrant, avouons-le. OK, vu le nombre de gens qui en sont morts pas marrant, intéressant au moins.
Evidement, il y a moins de drame, pas de prostituée repentie, pas de miracles à faire pâlir le meilleur des restaurateurs/oenologues, pas des dîners cannibales, mais ce n’est qu’une tablette. On peut broder dessus ad libitum.
[Addendum Plus pour ceux qui sont intéressés]
(1) I agree on ths one, but often the provenance isn’t available
(2) ink ? Anyway, there is a publication on dating submited.
The Dead Sea Scrolls isn’t the subject here, but thanx for the links.
“Probablement de l’arnaque” –
It is highly probable this stone tablet text is yet another sensationalist scam, as is clearly indicated by the facts
(1) that no specific information is available on its provenance and
(2) that no details are provided on carbon dating of the ink.
As such, this “news” falls right in line with the faked Lost-Tomb-of-Jesus “documentary” designed to make a profit off of people’s fascination with the “real” Jesus, and with the larger scandal of the biased and misleading way the Dead Sea scrolls are being presented in museum exhibits around the world. See, e.g.,
http://spinozaslens.com/libet/articles/dworkin_ethicsofexhibition.htm
and
http://blog.news-record.com/staff/frontpew/archives/2008/06/dead_sea_scroll.shtml.