The ever-increasing success of science has posed many challenges and conflicts for religion—conflicts which are resolved in individual lives in a variety of ways. Some accept both religion and science as dealing with quite different matters by different methods, and thus separate them so widely in their thinking that no direct confrontation is possible. Some repair rather completely to the camp of science or of religion and regard the other as ultimately of little importance, if not downright harmful. To me science and religion are both universal, and basically very similar. In fact, to make the argument clear, I should like to adopt the rather extreme point of view that their differences are largely superficial, and that the two become almost indistinguishable if we look at the real nature of each. It is perhaps science whose real nature is the less obvious, because of its blinding superficial successes. To explain this, and to give perspective to, the non-scientists, we must consider a bit of the history and development of science.

Edited by Oldcola
Je ne suis pas certain que le texte que Jean Staune avait copié/collé ici soit libre de copyrights, ainsi je laisse le début et je donne un lien qui pointe vers un pdf, mis à disposition par l’American Scientific Affiliation: A Fellowship of Christians in Science.

Jean, penses la prochaine fois d’en faire autant. Ou tu pourrais nous donner ton avis, si tu en as un qui n’a pas été copié/collé